When I have a camera and can test it, I'll obviously make additional comments. At this point, however, I'll simply let my original commentary stand. With a couple of notes: first, many have interpreted what I've written as saying that the D3x is "overpriced." No. The only way you could state such a conclusion would be after testing the camera, which I haven't done. My primary comment has been and continues to be that if Nikon really wanted to charge US$7999 for the camera, they did not set expectations correctly and launched in a way that there would be (and now has been) a backlash. That backlash continues more than a week after the introduction. Not that I take any pride in it, but this is what I said would happen, and what I was hinting at in some forum posts prior to the D3x introduction.